The
relics of the Buddha and his disciples are said to confirm
the results of dhamma practice. However It is widely known
that the formation of relics is due to the result of dhamma
practice However we are not in a position to judge or asume
the level of attainment by such individuals ands there are
a lot of different opinions about this among monks and laity.
Therefore, not wanting to go along with any point of view
in particular, we would prefer to use the term “Savaka-dhatu”
or “Relics of the buddha disciples”
instead of “Arahant-dhatu” except
for the monks who practiced during our lord buddha's lifetime.This
is because their attainment and realisation of the dhamma
were praised and confimed by the buddha himself. in some sections
the term “Dhatu“ is used instead
of “Relics“ as there are differences
in physical charactaristicswhich are obviously seen.
All
of the information in this website comes from the various
sources such as the Tipitaka, the commentary, the textbooks
or trustworthy people. There might be something different
from other books or we may have added more information which
is not shown in any books or cut out some stories which have
no references, such as the story of the elder lady who took
the buddha relics to bath. I have never believed that these
were not Buddha’s relics, and similarly for relics which not
in any reference book. However, anybody who doesn’t believe
in these might be biased.
I
believe that this website can help you know and understand
more on the relics of the Buddha and his disciples. However,
nothing is perfect, so as concerns any mistakes, I would take
responsibility and apologize, and would be grateful for any
comments via the email address
Nattachai
Yampikulsakul |
|